AI Data Center Stocks
Explore AI and HPC data centers across the globe. Public companies have a combined of capacity for AI and HPC workloads. AI data center stocks have emerged as one of the fastest-growing segments of the public equity market, driven by surging demand for GPU compute and large-scale AI infrastructure. Many of the companies tracked here are former Bitcoin miners that have pivoted their existing power and cooling infrastructure toward high-performance computing, securing multi-billion-dollar hyperscaler contracts with the likes of Microsoft, Amazon, and CoreWeave. This page lets you compare their operating capacity, facilities under development, and pipeline projects side by side — data you won't find on Bloomberg or Yahoo Finance. For related operational metrics, see our hash rate data and BTC production pages, or upgrade to a Professional plan for satellite imagery of every tracked facility.
Data Centers Tracked
Total Operating
Total Under Development
Total Pipeline
No data center data available.
AI Data Center Portfolios
Frequently Asked Questions About AI Data Centers
The following is how we categorize different capacities:
- Operating capacity refers to infrastructure that is fully built, energized, and actively delivering compute workloads. This includes facilities currently running AI training, inference, or high-performance computing services.
- Under development capacity represents projects that are in active construction or build-out. These sites typically have announced timelines, capital commitments, and expected energization dates, but are not yet live.
- Pipeline capacity includes power agreements, land control, or secured sites that a company has contracted or announced but has not yet begun developing. These projects may move forward depending on financing, customer contracts, or regulatory approvals.
- Total portfolio capacity is the combined sum of operating, under development, and pipeline capacity. It reflects the full scale of a company’s AI and HPC data center footprint, including both active infrastructure and planned expansion.
We update capacity figures whenever companies release new operational disclosures. In most cases, updates occur following quarterly earnings, SEC filings such as 10-Q, 10-K, or 8-K reports, investor presentations, or major hyperscaler and enterprise contract announcements.
Our approach is event-driven rather than calendar-based. When a company revises operating megawatts, signs a new AI hosting agreement, adjusts development timelines, or expands its power portfolio, we update the data accordingly.
Several publicly traded companies operate or are building AI data centers, many of which are former Bitcoin miners that have pivoted their power and cooling infrastructure toward high-performance computing and AI workloads. Notable examples include:
- Core Scientific (CORZ) — one of the largest AI/HPC data center operators with major CoreWeave hosting contracts
- IREN (IREN) — secured a significant Microsoft Azure hosting deal for AI workloads
- Applied Digital (APLD) — building next-generation AI data centers with CoreWeave as an anchor tenant
- Cipher Mining (CIFR) — expanding into HPC with AWS and Fluidstack partnerships
- WULF (WULF) — pivoting infrastructure toward AI with Fluidstack and Core42 contracts
- Hut 8 (HUT) — diversifying into AI infrastructure with Anthropic and Fluidstack hosting
Use the portfolio comparison chart above to see each company's operating, under development, and pipeline capacity in megawatts.
We make every effort to maintain accurate and current data on AI and HPC data center information. However, companies often use different terminology when describing operating, contracted, energized, secured, or potential megawatts. Reporting standards are not uniform across the industry, and development timelines or capacity targets may change.
While we continuously monitor updates, discrepancies or timing gaps may occur due to delayed filings or revised corporate disclosures.
All information on this platform is provided for informational purposes only. It should not be considered investment advice, financial advice, or a substitute for reviewing original company filings. Users should conduct independent due diligence and consult professional advisors before making capital allocation decisions.